chrisbrogan.com

Covering social media business strategy and personal power

  • Home
  • About
  • Speaking
  • Rockstars
  • Subscribe
  • Newsletters
40

Facebook Shows Me Boobies

November 22, 2007

Facebook just served me a topless woman in an ad.

Facebook | Home - Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 1 (Build 2007110903)
Uploaded with Skitch!

Now, understanding that the internet is for pr0n, but WTF, Facebook? Have I done anything to indicate that this ad would be appropriate? Search my cookies, kiddies. This box doesn’t check out the dirty websites (that’s another box).

Not cool.

Uncategorized
Article

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by Ike on November 22, 2007 @ 1:42 am

…and on November 21, 2007, Facebook officially jumped the shark. [Citation needed]

Comment by Gruen on November 22, 2007 @ 1:42 am

Did you mark yourself as Single, Male, and in Technology? I think Facebook’s ads are stereotyping that demographic just a bit. I get ads like that, too.

Comment by Gaurav Mishra on November 22, 2007 @ 1:46 am

Yes, Facebook is beginning to lose their head with their ads — bigger ads, too many ads, privacy-threatening ads, now porn ads.

Comment by Shashi Bellamkonda on November 22, 2007 @ 1:48 am

Not that there is enough of that on the net already. On the Washington Dc network on FB i used keep reporting a wall post that was very graphic. Not sure if it was ever taken down but I lost interest. They have to keep it clean.

of course all i get are vitamin ads - does Fb think i look unhealthy?

Pingback by SuperJogos - Todos os jogos da internet » Facebook Shows Me Boobies on November 22, 2007 @ 1:51 am

[...] Tapsait wrote an interesting post today!.Here’s a quick excerpt Facebook just served me a topless woman in an ad. [IMG Facebook | Home - Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 1 (Build 2007110903)] Uploaded with Skitch! Now, understanding that the internet is for pr0n, but WTF, Facebook? Have I done anything to indicate that this ad would be appropriate? Search my cookies, kiddies. This box doesn’t check out the dirty websites (that’s another box). Not cool. [IMG Technorati] Article, facebook, facebookporn[IMG Technorati] Article, facebook, facebookpornArticle, faceboo [...]

Pingback by Dinheiro Internet - Blog de Dinheiro » Facebook Shows Me Boobies on November 22, 2007 @ 1:53 am

[...] Tapsait wrote an interesting post today!.Here’s a quick excerpt Facebook just served me a topless woman in an ad. [IMG Facebook | Home - Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 1 (Build 2007110903)] Uploaded with Skitch! Now, understanding that the internet is for pr0n, but WTF, Facebook? Have I done anything to indicate that this ad would be appropriate? Search my cookies, kiddies. This box doesn’t check out the dirty websites (that’s another box). Not cool. [IMG Technorati] Article, facebook, facebookporn[IMG Technorati] Article, facebook, facebookpornArticle, faceboo [...]

Comment by Jim on November 22, 2007 @ 1:54 am

I sense a disturbance in The Force. I sense…a looming Facebook backlash.

Seriously, it’s Bitch on Facebook Week on the Discovery Channel. Is it Project Beacon, or whatever they call it now (as it is for me?) ‘Cause last week they were the darlings of the webz. Now, it seems, they’ve let just enough evil seep through the cracks that we’ll snap at anything. I know a good handful of peeps that have ditched their FB profiles for parts unknown. Thing is, we all knew this was coming. We all read about the ad deals.

Not to diss your gripe…it’s totally valid. Just seems like these cats can do no right these days.

The mob is fickle.

Oh, and wait ’til Twitter tries the same thing.

Pingback by green » Facebook Shows Me Boobies on November 22, 2007 @ 1:59 am

[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here’s a quick excerpt Facebook just served me a topless woman in an ad. [IMG Facebook | Home - Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 1 (Build 2007110903)] Uploaded with Skitch! Now, understanding that the internet is for pr0n, but WTF, Facebook? Have I done anything to indicate that this ad would be appropriate? Search my cookies, kiddies. This box doesn’t check out the dirty websites (that’s another box). Not cool. [IMG Technorati] Article, facebook, facebookporn[IMG Technorati] Article, facebook, facebookpornArticle, faceboo [...]

Comment by Douglas E. Welch on November 22, 2007 @ 2:00 am

It happens so often that when companies reach for the brass ring of the big score (read big money) they often end up falling off the horse.

I have been noticing more and more inappropriate ads every day since the big announcement. This is one reason I am not a big user of MySpace. I consider some of their ads (heck, most of them) NSFW.

Facebook is going to have to be very, very careful or what they thought might save them, could be what kills them.

Douglas

Comment by Lillian on November 22, 2007 @ 2:07 am

I agree. Totally uncool. At least on MySpace the tactless, tasteless, inappropriate stuff was all from the users. I am stunned and most of all disappointed.

Comment by Roxy Harte on November 22, 2007 @ 2:19 am

At least your profile fits…you are male.

Somewhere, somehow…someone, be it robot or human, decided I was male…now I get the…”I’m a hot, lonely girl, wanna chat?” ads…

Comment by David Fisher on November 22, 2007 @ 2:32 am

I never honestly even noticed the ads on facebook all that much until recently. They are getting a bit over the top. I generally figure that ‘most’ stuff on Facebook is SFW (well, not that it matters at the betahouse… but topless women on screen is still unprofessional). Someone in the ads department probably just slipped honestly. They probably have a ton of people sending in ads to post, and this just slipped.

Comment by Eric Skiff on November 22, 2007 @ 2:43 am

Yikes. I forget how different the web is with adblockplus turned off.

That’s really not cool of facebook - they need to get on that, and fast.

Pingback by University Update - Firefox - Facebook Shows Me Boobies on November 22, 2007 @ 3:45 am

[...] Facebook Shows Me Boobies » This Summary is from an article posted at [chrisbrogan.com] on Thursday, November 22, 2007 [...]

Comment by Dean Whitbread on November 22, 2007 @ 4:24 am

I thought everyone knew Facebook was corrupt and amoral, even though there are over 500 people inside it called Jesus Christ..

http://funk.co.uk/2007/11/facebook-fallout.html

Comment by Laura Fitton on November 22, 2007 @ 4:25 am

I am not stunned. I am not disappointed. I am mad as hell. Let it be remembered that Facebook BANNED and CENSORED photographs of nursing mothers from its pages. Nice.

Comment by Cathryn Hrudicka on November 22, 2007 @ 4:42 am

I must say, I’m in agreement with Laura Fitton, as well as you, Chris. I am so sick and tired of women’s breasts being shown everywhere as tantalizing sexual objects, and then Facebook had the nerve to ban photos of mothers using their breasts to feed children, their intended purpose. I had hoped I would not have to go through this many decades of my life without that attitude changing, and yet it seems to have gotten worse on the internet. I am also disgusted when I think of younger generations of women and girls still having to deal with this hypocrisy on a daily basis.

Tonight, I signed the MoveOn.org Facebook privacy petition. There is a Facebook privacy group protesting their privacy practices, which also affects their ad choices. I posted the group page, and I hope more people will sign it. We have a lot of power as Facebook users, because there are so many of us. We can demand fairness and our rights to privacy. Let’s do it.

Comment by Mark Harrison on November 22, 2007 @ 5:00 am

I think there is a huge difference between the following scenarios:

- Facebook have a policy that allows this kind of rubbish. (Either actively, or because they no longer bother checking.)

- Some junior, idiot, employee goofed.

It it’s the “policy” one, then as far as I’m concerned, it’ll be game over for facebook.

If it’s the “made a mistake” one, then I’m afraid that, under the circumstances, that should be grounds for summary dismissal AND a public apology from the Directors of facebook AND a genuine attempt to make sure it never happens again.

Even worse, if it’s the “disgruntled employee” variant of the “made a mistake” one, then that employee should be named and shamed.

Mark

Comment by TheDiva Rockin on November 22, 2007 @ 5:18 am

Boy do I feel slighted! heh.

Comment by Mike Allan on November 22, 2007 @ 7:13 am

That is totally inappropriate and wrong. As Laura reminds us they censored users pictures.

I hope you show this to someone from Facebook.

Comment by Donna Papacosta on November 22, 2007 @ 8:15 am

And this would be the same Facebook that didn’t allow photos of babies nursing, correct?

Comment by Laura Fitton on November 22, 2007 @ 8:28 am

Oh here’s a nifty update. They’ve been running ads with topless models since at least Sept.

See this blog post: http://urltea.com/25xv. Also, here’s *The Age* (Aus) on FB’s nursing photo bans/memberships revoked http://urltea.com/25xw.

Other than that, I’m actually in a grateful frame of mind for Thanksgiving. But, gee.

Comment by Aslin Kirkpatrick on November 22, 2007 @ 9:35 am

Like I said to my professor, it’s the inevitable. Private sphere is no longer valid with internet.

Comment by Jof Arnold on November 22, 2007 @ 11:36 am

I thought they said their ads were targeted? I’m not sure about the quality of their targeting… However you got off lightly, Chris; facebook seems to think I’m gay, live in San Fran and lead a somewhat “alternative” lifestyle in the evenings :-S Go figure.

Comment by mARSHAL SANDLER on November 22, 2007 @ 11:42 am

Folks never confuse effort with results ! What do you expect from a group of kids that became untouchable to the tune of Millions of Dollars ! I have felt that Facebook is an experiment, until mature people like Microsoft Management make it a business ! Right now it may br profitable but it may wind up and Edsel !

Comment by Justin Russell on November 22, 2007 @ 11:46 am

Chris, looks like you found a good one there.

I’d send ‘em a support inquiry with this page to see what they say. If you get a canned, “we’re sorry you’re not satisfied” response, I wouldn’t be surprised at all. That’s what has happened with my last two requests.

I’m very, very quickly starting to hate Facebook.

Comment by Erica on November 22, 2007 @ 11:49 am

In serious poor taste. I do not favor Facebook… but even less now.

Comment by Niamh Kiernan on November 22, 2007 @ 1:06 pm

Please don’t tell me that Twitter will start to titter.

Comment by chrisbrogan on November 22, 2007 @ 1:18 pm

David Parmet seems to have similar but different problems.

Comment by Peter on November 22, 2007 @ 1:55 pm

Hi Chris,

Well I hope you reported it!

We can expect some of this until the hype fades down and the GRQ merchants move on.

BYW nice face, shame about the boob jobs ;-)

(erm. was that inappropriate… LOL)

BTW I find it less harassing than the Facebook advert for the sad eyed monkey to stamp out animal cruelty. That damn monkey gets me every time :-( And it’s not even a topless shot…

Peter

Comment by Mark on November 22, 2007 @ 2:14 pm

I feel left out.

(and I despise FB more every day)

Comment by Noah David Simon on November 22, 2007 @ 4:16 pm

these are the people that disabled my account?

Pingback by Facebook paga peitinho « Onegaishimasu on November 23, 2007 @ 7:22 am

[...] paga peitinho O Facebook está mesmo superafim de ganhar dinheiro com publicidade. Um blogger gringo avisa que agora os ads incluem [...]

Comment by Teresa Valdez Klein on November 23, 2007 @ 3:14 pm

You mark yourself as single, male and interested in technology, you get adult ads.

You mark yourself as single, female and interested in technology and you get ads for weight loss products…

Comment by Dee on November 23, 2007 @ 3:23 pm

The only ads I get are for dating services and concerts.

Comment by Glyn on November 23, 2007 @ 4:02 pm

It’s A Feature Not A Bug.

(But seriously, I’d imagine it’s a case of somebody not vetting advertisers’ content thoroughly. I wonder how much actual human oversight was involved with the displaying of that ad.)

Comment by vicequeenmaria on November 23, 2007 @ 4:06 pm

Are you f*cking kidding me? Obviously *I* won’t see this ad, will I? Are we pissed off b/c we expected this of Myspace and not FB? And here Google is not accepting text ads to Sex and the Beach, which is like grandma’s bloomers compared to this ad!

Pingback by Friday Frippery | Enemy of Entropy on November 24, 2007 @ 5:14 am

[...] Chris Bogan reports that Facebook showed him boobies. I know they’re ad-supported, but hello, that’s the clue phone ringing! Maybe they [...]

Pingback by Social Media Top 5, Thanksgiving edition: Breastbook wants to poke you « Doug Haslam: Gischeleman’s Blog on November 25, 2007 @ 10:18 pm

[...] Brogan must be a leg man because he objects to the breast meat on his Facebook page. Any excuse to show the offending graphic again on your blog, eh, Mr. “doth protest too [...]

Pingback by Why is transparency important? Does anyone really care? | Social Media | Jon Ray on being a young marketing consultant/media/video producer and creating compelling content, marketing and social media campaigns. on December 7, 2007 @ 6:01 am

[...] And while we’re on the subject, I think Enron gets a bad wrap. Were they hiding debt in an attempt to inflate profits and prop up stock prices? That’s one side of the story. But, Enron’s accounting was complex. Was it questionable? Perhaps. But, if we’re going to call that and the WoldCom scandal “questionable,” Then you’d think we’d hold everyone to that standard and I don’t see any pointing of fingers at other companies that are participating in “questionable” activities. [...]

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Want to get the blog in your inbox? Enter your email (no spam):

Delivered by FeedBurner

  • About Chris
    Chris Brogan advises businesses, organizations and individuals on how to use social media and social networks to build relationships and deliver value.

    I work with:

    CrossTechMedialogo

  • Recent Posts
    • Bloggers Need Errors and Omissions Insurance
    • Customer Service Hoops
    • Note to Social Media Types- Build Your Interfaces
    • Music News
    • Magnify Goes to the Blogs
  • FREE eBook
    free ebook
    Trust Economies (w/Julien Smith)

  • Blog Archives
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
  • Contact Chris
    • blog at chrisbrogan.com
    • 978-885-1551
    • AIM: cbrogandotcom
  • Find me on LinkedIn
  • Search
  • Tag Cloud
    advertising Announcement Article b2b b2c blogging blogs books business chrisbrogan community conference conferences conversation customerservice event events facebook howto identity internetvideo interview marketing media podcamp podcast podcasting Promotion rss search self-improvement socialmedia socialmedia100 socialnetworking socialnetworks SocialSoftware software Strategy technology twitter Uncategorized video videoblog writing yahoo
  •  
  • Lijit Search
  • Upcoming.org Events
    More of chrisbrogan's events

Powered by Wordpress | Based on WP Premium theme by WP Remix. Customized by SnowyDay Design.
All contents Creative Commons licensed. chrisbrogan.com. Click here for rights info.